Legal Opinion

Miguel Angel Ramos v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 15, 2004No. 03-4050PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

What is the location of a proceeding conducted in two places at once? Immigration officials, who propose to remove Miguel Angel Ramos from the United States, offered him a hearing in Council Bluffs, Iowa. There Ramos, his lawyer, his witnesses, and the lawyer for the government testified and argued in front of a television set, connected by teleconference equipment to the chambers of an immigration judge in Chicago, Illinois. At the end of a hearing the immigration judge read a decision into the record; a formal order bore the caption:

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. Borovsky v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Mario Howard LloydCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  3. Custom Vehicles, Inc. v. Forest River, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  4. Sorcia v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  5. Miguel Angel Ramos v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API