Legal Opinion
Doe v. Zappala
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 17, 2009No. 92 C.D. 2009PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
In this appeal, John Doe (Appellant) asks whether the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County (trial court) erred in denying his request for permanent injunction, pursuant to the Criminal History Records Information Act (CHRIA), 18 Pa. C.S. §§ 9101-9183, against Stephen A. Zappala, Jr., District Attorney, Bruce Beemer, Deputy District Attorney, and, the Bureau of Police of the Department of Public Safety of the City of Pittsburgh (collectively, the Commonwealth). The trial court determined the records Appellant sought to enjoin from use include investigative…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. D.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. ButlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Department of the Auditor General v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Greenfield Township Municipal Authority v. D.R. Burket TrustCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SchraderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Taha v. Bucks County PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Com. v. Smith, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Doe v. ZappalaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- iDropped Inc. v. Summo, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2015