Legal Opinion
Beraksa v. Stardust Records, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 3, 1963No. Civ. 25984PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BISHOP, J. pro tem. *
This is an appeal by John E. Crooks and George W. Creveling, who, as defendants and cross-defendants, have had judgment rendered against them for various amounts on at least six different theories. We have concluded that the judgment should be affirmed.
A brief sketch of the plot forming the background of the case may contribute to an understanding of the problems presented by the appeal. There was, in the City of Long Beach, an eating-drinking place known as The Twin Flame Boom (Flame Boom) owned and operated by defendant Stardust Becords, Inc. Stardust, as we shall refer…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Lawrence v. I. N. Parlier Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Pacific Coast Cheese, Inc. v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Acme Paper Co. v. GoffsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Community Collaborative of Bridgeport, Inc. v. GanimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Covenant Mutual Insurance v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Department of Forestry & Fire Protection v. LeBrockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Government of the Northern Mariana Islands v. Micronesian Insurance UnderwritersNorthern Mariana Islands Commonwealth Trial Court · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.