Legal Opinion
Department of Forestry & Fire Protection v. LeBrock
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 11, 2002No. B149202PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERREN, J.
Kelly LeBrock appeals from the denial of her motion for attorneys fees after she successfully defended a suit by respondent, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF), to recover the costs of suppressing a fire originating on her property. We affirm.
Facts
After fighting a fire originating on LeBrock’s property, CDF sent her a letter demanding reimbursement of $230,062.63 for the costs incurred in suppressing and investigating the fire. LeBrock did not pay the demand and CFD filed suit alleging, among other things, that Health and Safety Code section 13009.1…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2004
- Dep't of Forestry & Fire Prot. v. Howell, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Otay Ranch, L.People v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Sanders v. LawsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection v. HowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.