Legal Opinion

Huntington & Finke Co. v. Lake Erie Lumber & Supply Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1924No. 17949PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

In the trial court and in the Court of Appeals the parties stood in relatively the same position they do here, and will be referred to respectively as plaintiff and defendant. The contractual relations between these parties, out of which this controversy grows, rest upon letters, telegrams, and other written documents concerning the purchase of lath, together with a certain verbal agreement entered into on March 15, 1919, in the city of Cleveland, between the witness Jones, on behalf of the defendant, and the witness Bernhard, on behalf of the plaintiff, the substance of which was that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hanson & Parker, Ltd. v. WittenbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  2. Osgood v. Bauder & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  3. Myer v. Wheeler & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  4. West v. BechtelMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Williams v. RobbMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Arbino v. Johnson & JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Ignazio v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. S & M Constructors, Inc. v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Toledo Police Patrolmen's Ass'n, Local 10 v. City of ToledoOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Material Contractors, Inc. v. DonahueOhio Supreme Court · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API