Legal Opinion

Material Contractors, Inc. v. Donahue

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1968No. 40601PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO ’Neujo, J.

The question presented to the court may be stated thus: Is the lease agreement between Material Contractors and Corrugated Container divisible?

In substance, the agreement provides four undertakings by each of the parties.

Material Contractors agrees:

1. To lease certain motor vehicle equipment to Corrugated Containers;

2. To maintain the equipment in workable condition, using its own labor and materials;

3. To supply all gasoline and motor vehicle fuel necessary to operate the equipment;

4.. To furnish all licenses needed to operate the vehi-elés.

In turn, Corrugated Container agrees:

*221. To pay an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Illinois Bankers Life Assn.Indiana Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Huntington & Finke Co. v. Lake Erie Lumber & Supply Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Penske Truck Leasing Co. v. HuddlestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re Plum Run Service Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1993
  3. In Re RitcheyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1988
  4. City of Phoenix v. Arizona Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  5. Geckle v. DubnoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API