Material Contractors, Inc. v. Donahue
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO ’Neujo, J.
The question presented to the court may be stated thus: Is the lease agreement between Material Contractors and Corrugated Container divisible?
In substance, the agreement provides four undertakings by each of the parties.
Material Contractors agrees:
1. To lease certain motor vehicle equipment to Corrugated Containers;
2. To maintain the equipment in workable condition, using its own labor and materials;
3. To supply all gasoline and motor vehicle fuel necessary to operate the equipment;
4.. To furnish all licenses needed to operate the vehi-elés.
In turn, Corrugated Container agrees:
*221. To pay an…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Armstrong v. Illinois Bankers Life Assn.Indiana Supreme Court · 1940
- Huntington & Finke Co. v. Lake Erie Lumber & Supply Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by10 opinions
- Penske Truck Leasing Co. v. HuddlestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Plum Run Service Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1993
- In Re RitcheyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1988
- City of Phoenix v. Arizona Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Geckle v. DubnoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.