Legal Opinion

West v. Bechtel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1900PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Kent; Grove, J. Assumpsit by Ben E. "West and Judson C. West, copartners as B. E. West & Co., against Charles J. Bechtel, for the breach of a contract to deliver wood. From a judgment for plaintiffs on verdict directed by the court, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Plaintiffs are coal and wood dealers in Grand Bapids, and the defendant is a dealer in wood at Mantón, Mich. The former offered to purchase 400 cords of wood at one dollar per cord, f. o. b. car at Man-ton, from the latter, if he would ship “right away,” promising to remit as fast as the wood should “ come in.” The offer was accepted. Both offer and acceptance were by letter, the acceptance being dated January 14, 1899. Three cars were shipped, and two were paid for. On February 7, 1899, plaintiffs wrote, asking that wood be shipped faster, stating that they needed the wood. February 22,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Norrington v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. RichardsIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Graves v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. Cahen v. . PlattNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Hawley v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Quarton v. American Law Book Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Dow Chemical Co. v. Detroit Chemical WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Michigan Yacht & Power Co. v. BuschCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  4. Huntington & Finke Co. v. Lake Erie Lumber & Supply Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Cadillac Machine Co. v. Mitchell-Diggins Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API