Legal Opinion

Wulbern v. Gilroy Express

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 21, 1931No. Docket No. 7627PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARD, J., pro tem.

This is an action for personal injuries. The defendant in his answer pleaded contributory negligence. A jury rendered a verdict in the sum of $2,000 in favor of the plaintiff. The trial court granted a motion for a new trial on the ground of the insufficiency of evidence to sustain the verdict. • Plaintiff appealed from the order granting the motion for a new trial.

At about 11 o’clock P. M. on the night of the accident a truck, with trailer attached, owned and operated by defend ants, was proceeding in a southerly direction along the state highway near Belmont in San Mateo…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Campanella v. CampanellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Biaggi v. RamontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Estate of BainbridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Rosenberg v. Geo. A. Moore & Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Merralls v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bencich v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Weaver v. Shell Oil Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Lucerne Country Club v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Owings v. GatchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Estate of WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API