Wulbern v. Gilroy Express
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WARD, J., pro tem.
This is an action for personal injuries. The defendant in his answer pleaded contributory negligence. A jury rendered a verdict in the sum of $2,000 in favor of the plaintiff. The trial court granted a motion for a new trial on the ground of the insufficiency of evidence to sustain the verdict. • Plaintiff appealed from the order granting the motion for a new trial.
At about 11 o’clock P. M. on the night of the accident a truck, with trailer attached, owned and operated by defend ants, was proceeding in a southerly direction along the state highway near Belmont in San Mateo…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Campanella v. CampanellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Biaggi v. RamontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Estate of BainbridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Rosenberg v. Geo. A. Moore & Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
- Merralls v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bencich v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Weaver v. Shell Oil Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Lucerne Country Club v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Owings v. GatchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Estate of WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.