Legal Opinion

Liebl v. Schaeffer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1925No. 19106. Department OnePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought for the purpose of foreclosing a real estate mortgage. The defense was the statute of limitations. The trial court sustained the right of foreclosure, and the defendants W. Gf. Boland and wife appeal.

The facts essential to be stated are these. On October 11,1912, Fred Schaeffer and wife were the owners of certain real estate’ in Yakima county, and on that date executed a mortgage upon the same to secure the payment of a $4,000 promissory note. On December 12, 1918, the note and mortgage were transferred to the respondent in this case. On February 19, 1915, the property…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  2. Phifer v. AbbottSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  3. Foster v. BowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. McLane v. AllisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  5. Curtis v. HoleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Humbird v. ArnetMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Turner v. PowellMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Hamilton v. PearceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  4. Holland Bank v. BrockmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API