Hamilton v. Pearce
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtAndersen, J.
Facts of Case
A diesel-equipped power shovel was sold by respondents, Dave Hamilton and William V. Sanden, d/b/a T & H Equipment Company. There are hereinafter referred to as the “sellers.”
A. W. Pearce and Willard Whitney, d/b/a Bald Hill Quarry purchased the power shovel for use in their Snoho-mish County quarry. At a later date they entered into an agreement with Prosper Derycke and Ernest Levold, one of the terms of which was that Derycke and Levold would pay the debts that Pearce and Whitney incurred in the quarry operation. Pearce, Whitney, Derycke and Levold, all of whom are appellants…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ah How v. FurthWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Cannavina v. PostonWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Gorge Lumber Co. v. Brazier Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Keen v. O'ROURKEWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Walker v. SiegWashington Supreme Court · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- L.R. Foy Construction Co. v. South Dakota State Cement Plant CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Hopper v. HemphillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Autovest v. AgostoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2021
- Mobile Discount Corp. v. PriceNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Nilson v. Castle Rock School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.