Legal Opinion

George Washington University v. Weintraub

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 1983No. 80-137, 80-394PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Associate Judge:

Appellants, a landlord and building manager, contend in these consolidated appeals that the trial court erred in allowing appel-lees, their tenants, to recover damage for losses arising from a flood in their apartment building. At issue is the scope of a landlord’s duty to maintain rental premises in compliance with housing code regulations. Specifically appellants challenge the right of tenants-appellees to bring an affirmative cause of action for damages under the’circumstances of this case, the refusal of the trial court to bar recovery on the basis of an exculpatory…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pugh v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Boston Housing Authority v. HemingwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Javins v. First National Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  4. Mease Ex Rel. Oliver v. FoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  5. Kline v. BurnsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Gore v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. District of Columbia v. MitchellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Elyse De Stefano v. Apts. Downtown, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  4. Twyman v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Childs v. PurllDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API