Legal Opinion
Kline v. Burns
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 5, 1971No. 6051PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.
Martin R. Burns, occupying premises at 26 Tanner Court in Portsmouth, instituted an action against Samuel Kline to recover all rent paid during occupancy of the premises on the ground that the rental was in violation of the city housing code. Portsmouth Code of Ordinances (July 1968) ch. 14. Samuel and Gertrude Kline then brought actions for possession under RSA 540:12, 13-14 (supp.) against Burns at 26 Tanner Court and against Fred Daggett at 28 Tanner Court.' The Klines also brought actions against them to recover unpaid rent for these premises. The five actions were tried together.
Trial of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Marini v. IrelandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Javins v. First National Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Lemle v. BreedenHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
- Pines v. PerssionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Reste Realty Corporation v. CooperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Pugh v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Trentacost v. BrusselSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.