Legal Opinion

Tamarkin Co. v. Wheeler

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 2, 1992No. 15179PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reece, Judge.

This appeal of a final judgment rendered May 31, 1991 by the Summit County Court of Common Pleas arises from the claim of Eric S. Wheeler, employee-appellee, for workers’ compensation benefits. Wheeler’s original application was disallowed by a district hearing officer in Akron on the grounds that the injury was not sustained during the course of employment. The Canton Regional Board of Review reached a contrary conclusion. This latter decision was affirmed by the Industrial Commission.

Wheeler’s employer, Tamarkin Company, appealed to the court of common pleas on May 25, 1990.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fisher v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Lord v. DaughertyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Bralley v. DaughertyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. MTD Products, Inc. v. RobatinOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Kohlmayer v. KellerOhio Supreme Court · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lorain County Board of Commissioners v. United States Fire InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. State v. StallingsOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Preferred Capital, Inc. v. Power Engineering Group, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Carrick v. Riser Foods, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Decapua v. LambacherOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API