Legal Opinion

Quemahoning Coal Co. v. Sanitary Earthenware Specialty Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1915PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On appeal from the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Walker, Chancellor.

By a written contract between the parties the defendant agreed to purchase from the plaintiff certain carloads of “Ealphton Smokeless Coal,” and the latter sued the former in the Supreme Court for a certain amount due for shipments of such coal, which defendant received and part of which it used, tendering back the unused part. The defence was that plaintiff represented that the coal could be used with good results in firing defendant’s pottery kilns, and that defendant, relying upon such representations, used the coal in firing…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Flaccomio v. EysinkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  2. Iron Fireman Coal Stoker Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Aetna Chemical Co. v. Spaulding & Kimball Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1924
  4. Santa Rosa-Vallejo Tanning Co. v. Charles Kronauer & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1923
  5. Wisdom v. Morris Hardware Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API