Legal Opinion

Aetna Chemical Co. v. Spaulding & Kimball Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 7, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, C. J.

This is an action of contract to recover for goods both sold and delivered after the Uniform Sales Act took effect. Defendant pleaded general denial, payment, set-off with declaration and specification, and special plea alleging failure of consideration and non-performance of the contract by plaintiff. At the close of the evidence a verdict was directed for plaintiff to recover its claim amounting to $542.18, with costs. The case is here on defendant’s exceptions.

Defendant, a corporation, is engaged in the wholesale mercantile business at Burlington, selling goods to the trade, its customers…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Conner v. HendersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1818
  3. Bassett v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Porges v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Smith v. Niagara Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1887

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Land Finance Corp. v. Sherwin Electric Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  2. Iron Fireman Coal Stoker Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Town of Manchester v. Town of TownshendSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  4. Citizens Bank v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  5. Fox Film Corp. v. Ogden Theatre Co., Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API