Santa Rosa-Vallejo Tanning Co. v. Charles Kronauer & Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matchett
This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury for $12,338.90. The statement of claim showed a demand for that amount by reason of the sale by plaintiff to defendant of 100 rolls of Buttbranded harness leather, 33 rolls of which were stated to be “held for shipping instructions.”
The defendant in its affidavit of merits admitted the giving of an order for the 100 rolls of harness leather at the price of 70 cents a pound; set up that the shipping of 67 rolls had been made at different times; that the first 9 rolls of leather were of .the kind and quality…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Osgood v. SkinnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Underwood v. WolfIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Fuchs & Lang Manufacturing Co. v. R. J. Kittredge & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1909
- Lonergan v. StewartIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Morris v. WibauxIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Appleman v. Fabert Motors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961
- Groban v. S.S. PeguDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Freedman v. Madison & Kedzie State BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
- Moscahlades Bros., Inc. v. Mallars & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
- New York Hamilton Corp. v. First Illinois Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.