Legal Opinion

Kolda v. City of Yankton

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 2014No. 26683, 26746PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] The City of Yankton (the City) terminated Eric Kolda, a police officer, for violating police department policies. Kol-da was notified of his termination by letter. Kolda appealed to the city manager. Following an evidentiary hearing, the city manager found cause for the disciplinary action and upheld the termination. Kolda then sued in circuit court, claiming wrongful discharge. On separate motions for summary judgment, the circuit court ruled that Kolda could only be terminated for cause with notice and the City failed to provide pre-termination notice. A jury found…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Bertelsen v. Allstate Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Finck v. City of TeaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Hollander v. Douglas CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Schafer v. DEUEL COUNTY BD. OF COM'RS.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Abata v. Pennington Cnty. Bd. of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Abata v. Pennington Cty. Bd. of Comm'rsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Bohn v. BuenoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API