Legal Opinion
Opinion No. 72-108 (1972) Ag
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Decided February 17, 1972Published
1Opinion of the Court
** Summary ** VOTING MACHINE USE CONSTITUTIONAL Title 26 O.S. 274 [26-274] (1971), relating to the use of vertical column voting machines, is valid and constitutional. The Attorney General has considered your request for an opinion. where in you ask in your letter of January 10, 1972, the following question: "Is Title 26 O.S. 274 [26-274] (1971) valid and constitutional?" You stated in your letter that the voting machines used in Tulsa County offer a vertical columnar presentation of individual candidates for office These machines do not have capabilities of straight party voting where more…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sheldon v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Nesbitt v. District Court of Mayes CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Isaacs v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Elias v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Haas v. HollomanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.