Hasten v. State
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.
Charles Hasten, appellant herein, was convicted in the superior court of Maricopa county upon an information which charged him with operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and has appealed from the judgment and the order denying a new trial.
There are three assignments of error. The first raises the question of the admissibility of certain evidence as to the speed at which appellant was driving when arrested. It is urged that the speed of his car has no connection with the particular offense charged. We cannot agree with this contention. It is a notorious…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. RodgersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
- People v. DingleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- People v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- People v. EkstromerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- State v. NobleOregon Supreme Court · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ConnollyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Poulnot v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. SisnerosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. NealNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- Clayton v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1931
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.