Legal Opinion

Moeller v. Packard

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1927No. Docket No. 3303PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

Upon a record prepared in accord with the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure, and after a motion for a new trial was made by him and denied by the court, the plaintiff prosecutes an appeal from the judgment rendered and entered against him in an action in which he claims damages for injuries alleged to have- been negligently inflicted by defendant upon the person of his (the plaintiffs’) infant daughter and for her death resulting therefrom, the cause having been tried by the court, sitting without a jury.

The complaint, after describing the manner in which the injuries…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Green v. Los Angeles Terminal Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Hoy v. TornichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Zarzana v. Neve Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Raggio v. MalloryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Union Bank v. WendlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Brautigam v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Long v. BarbieriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API