Legal Opinion
G.R. v. Intelligator
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 10, 2010No. G042006PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOORE, J.
The trial court granted defendant Irene Intelligator’s special motion to strike (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16) the complaint of plaintiff G.R. (Husband) and awarded Intelligator attorney fees and costs. It also denied Husband’s motion for reconsideration of the attorney fee and costs award, due to lack of jurisdiction. Husband appeals from both rulings.
When Intelligator, an attorney representing Husband’s ex-wife (Wife) in certain postmarital dissolution proceedings, filed a copy of Husband’s credit report in support of a motion, Intelligator was clearly involved in petitioning…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Christian Research Institute v. AlnorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Paul for Council v. HanyeczCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Wallace v. McCubbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- 569 East County Boulevard LLC v. Backcountry Against the Dump, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Fremont Reorganizing Corp. v. FaiginCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Hasso v. HapkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Bergstein v. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.