Legal Opinion

United States v. Allen

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided October 1, 1979No. 34,660; CM 434557PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

FLETCHER, Chief Judge:

This case involves a conviction of attempted rape and oral and anal sodomy.1 *346At the request of the treating doctor certain specimens were taken for laboratory analysis during the examination of the victim. The evaluation reports of these samples were offered by the prosecution and admitted by the court as business record exceptions to the hearsay rule. We are called upon to answer whether it was prejudicial error to admit these exhibits as evidence of the truth of the matters stated therein, over the objection made by the defense counsel. We find that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Vincent E. Jenkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. HammondUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  2. United States v. RojasU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1983
  3. United States v. SnodgrassU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986
  4. United States v. ShorteU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  5. United States v. BledsoeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API