Legal Opinion
Sherman v. Ronco
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 26, 2010No. SC 18320PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
General Statutes § 52-577d allows a person who claims that he or she was sexually abused, exploited or assaulted as a minor to bring a personal injury action on the basis of that abuse until the alleged victim reaches thirty years beyond the age of eighteen. The parties in the present case agree that the plaintiff, Lawrence C. Sherman, filed his original complaint within the limitations period established by § 52-577d. The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly concluded that certain counts of the plaintiffs amended substitute complaint, which was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Giglio v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Sharp v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Kevin Wagner v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Keenan v. Yale New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Macellaio v. Newington Police DepartmentConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Torres v. CarreseConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Briere v. Greater Hartford Orthopedic Group, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- MacDermid, Inc. v. Cookson Group, PLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.