Legal Opinion

Seaport Capital Partners, LLC v. Speer

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 10, 2017No. AC39315PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.

The plaintiff in error, Edward Bona, 1 brings this writ of error to challenge the decisions of the trial court granting the motions of the defendant in error, Seaport Capital Partners, LLC (Seaport), for order of payment, and denying Bona's motions to reargue the order of payment. Bona claims that the court (1) lacked subject matter jurisdiction, (2) improperly granted Seaport's motions for order of payment, and (3) improperly denied Bona's motions to reargue. We disagree with Bona and, accordingly, dismiss the writ of error.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Butler ex rel. Skidmore v. Hartford Technical Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Hartford Federal Sayings & Loan Ass'n v. TuckerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  4. Lyme Land Conservation Trust, Inc. v. PlatnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  5. MacDermid, Inc. v. Cookson Group, PLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Seaport Capital Partners, LLC v. SpeerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  2. Seaport Capital Partners, LLC v. Sheri Speer Seaport Capital Partners, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API