Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of Smith

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 30, 1973No. 711-3PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcInturff, J.

The sole issue presented is whether a superior court, when reviewing an order of a court commissioner, is bound by the substantial evidence rule enunciated in Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc., 54 Wn.2d 570, 343 P.2d 183 (1959). We answer in the negative, and reverse.

On June 22, 1972 the Superior Court Commissioner of Douglas County entered an order depriving petitioners of the custody of four minor children. On August 23, 1972 the superior court affirmed this order.

In the course of an oral opinion the trial judge said:

Well, counsel, we may as well take it in the order that Mr. Woolett…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State Ex Rel. Biddinger v. GriffithsWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Eastern Outfitting Co. v. LambWashington Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of LarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In re the Marriage of MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re Marriage of MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In re the Marriage of DoddCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. In Re the Welfare of McGeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API