Legal Opinion

Mahan v. Bethesda Hospital, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 1992No. C-910595PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs-appellants, Samuel E. Mahan III and Kathleen Mahan, appeal from the judgment entered in favor of the defendants-appellees, Bethesda Hospital, Inc. and Eugene Elam, M.D., pursuant to a jury verdict in the trial of their medical negligence action. In their eight assignments of error the plaintiffs contend that the trial court committed errors as follows: (1) in refusing to instruct the jury on res ipsa loquitur; (2) in refusing to allow their expert witness, a chiropractor, to render an opinion on causation; (3) in striking the expert testimony of plaintiffs’ vocational economic…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Nickell v. GonzalezOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State ex rel. Evans v. Bainbridge Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Jennings Buick, Inc. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Church v. PeralesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. Brokamp v. Mercy Hospital AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Miller-McGee v. Washington Hospital CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Kreller Group, Inc. v. WFS Financial, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Wheeler v. WiseOhio Court of Appeals · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API