Kreller Group, Inc. v. WFS Financial, Inc.

Mark P. Painter, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, WFS Financial, Inc., appeals the trial court’s denial of WFS’s motions for directed verdict, judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and a new trial. WFS also claims that the trial court erred by admitting evidence that confused the issues and prejudiced the jury. The jury had found that WFS owed plaintiff-appellee, Kreller Group, Inc., $616,009.67 for consulting services. We affirm.

I. The High Cost of Credit Reports

{¶ 2} Kreller is a consulting company based in Cincinnati. Kreller advises its clients on how to reduce costs when purchasing…