Legal Opinion

Panko v. Grimes

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 6, 1956PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

40 N.J. Super. 588 (1956)

123 A.2d 799

GEORGE PANKO AND MAE PANKO, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

PAULINE GRIMES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 18, 1956.

Decided July 6, 1956.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.

Mr. Herbert Horn argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Lloyd and Horn, attorneys).

Mr. Robert N. Wilentz argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents (Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman, Spitzer and Sills, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, J.A.D.

Mrs. Mae Panko had a verdict of $8,000 for personal…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. DicksonTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Kimic v. San Jose-Los Gatos Interurban Ry.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Bryan v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Kelly v. MartinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Klein v. GantnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. George Lee Mims, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Angel v. Rand Express Lines, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. State v. FreemanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  4. Peer v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  5. Freedman v. CHOLICK ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API