Legal Opinion

Klein v. Gantner

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1893No. 16,321PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Rush Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

This ease was an action by appellants on a note and mortgage, the note being executed by the appellee, John Gantner, and the mortgage securing the same executed by both appellees.

No question arises upon the answer of the appellee, John Gantner. The appellee, Catharine Gantner, answered, first, by a general denial.and, second, that she is the wife of John Gantner, and has been for thirty years; that in 1868, she loaned her husband $650, and in 1874, the further sum of $1,000, with which money he purchased the real estate upon which appellants sought to foreclose the mortgage in suit; that on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sohn & Co. v. GantnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Adams v. Peter Tramontin Motor SalesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. Evans v. RohrbachNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. Panko v. GrimesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. Lane v. HoldermanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  5. NY, SUSQUEHANNA AND WRR CO. v. VermeulenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API