Grolemund v. Cafferata
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
Lena Grolemund and Caesaer Grolemund, her husband, instituted this action against Emilio Cafferata and the respective sheriffs of the city and county of San Francisco and the county of San Mateo, for the purpose of procuring a permanent injunction restraining defendants from proceeding with the sale of certain personal property in San Francisco and certain real property in San Mateo County pursuant to executions issued on a judgment in favor of defendant Emilio Cafferata and others, as plaintiffs, and against plaintiff Caesaer Grolemund, as defendant. From a final judgment in favor of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. MalcolmSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Noyes v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada v. OutlerWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Smedberg v. BevilockwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Vai v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Weinberg v. WeinbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Mears v. MearsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.