The Prudential Insurance Co. v. Beck
California Court of Appeal
1Dissent
WARD, J., Dissenting.
I dissent.
The facts are briefly but fairly stated in the majority opinion. Any additional facts will be hereinafter set forth. On the trial of the case two issues were presented, namely, did the assured make an assignment of his life insurance policies with the intention of defrauding his creditors, and assuming proof of such purpose, may an exemption (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 690.19), arising from such fraud, be claimed? The court found that the assignments were made when the assignor was insolvent and were “made with the intention to hinder, delay and defraud his…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Holden v. StrattonSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Blethen v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Lefrooth v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Delanoy v. DelanoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Truelsch v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.