Legal Opinion · Dissent

The Prudential Insurance Co. v. Beck

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 1940No. Civ. 11291Published

1Dissent

WARD, J., Dissenting.

I dissent.

The facts are briefly but fairly stated in the majority opinion. Any additional facts will be hereinafter set forth. On the trial of the case two issues were presented, namely, did the assured make an assignment of his life insurance policies with the intention of defrauding his creditors, and assuming proof of such purpose, may an exemption (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 690.19), arising from such fraud, be claimed? The court found that the assignments were made when the assignor was insolvent and were “made with the intention to hinder, delay and defraud his…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Holden v. StrattonSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Blethen v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Lefrooth v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Delanoy v. DelanoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Truelsch v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API