Raynor v. . Raynor

Three questions are presented by this appeal.’ If these questions are answered, each, in the affirmative, the judgment of the Superior Court must be affirmed; otherwise, the judgment must be reversed. The questions are :

1. Was it the intention of John I. Raynor, as disclosed by the language used by him in the clause contained in his deeds to the defendants, respectively, construed in the light of all the facts shown in the record, to impose upon the grantee in each of said deeds personal liability for the payment of one-ninth of the amount' of his indebtedness to the Greensboro Joint Stock…