Legal Opinion

Lancaster v. Stanfield

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 10, 1926PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

Plaintiffs and defendant, and twelve other persons on 28 April, 1920, were the owners of all the stock of the Pinetops Drying Plant, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of North Carolina, for the purpose of engaging in business in the town of Pinetops, N. C. On said day, Pinetops Drying Plant, Inc., executed two notes, each for the sum of $5,000, both payable one hundred and eighty days after date, to the order of Pinetops Banking Company. On the back of each note, appear the following words:

“All parties to this note, whether as sureties, endorsers, or guarantors, hereby…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Houser v. . FayssouxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Sykes v. EverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Dillard v. Farmers Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Barber v. William Absher Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Gillam v. . WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hunsucker v. High Point Bending & Chair Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Spector United Employees Credit Union v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Sykes v. . EverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Stanley v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Fulton R. Gordon, Inc. v. SchramDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API