Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Federal Land Bank

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

Appellants assign as error the ruling of the court below that the recital in a deed of an agreement to contribute to the 'support of the grantor, as the consideration for the execution of the deed, was sufficient to impose a charge on the land and to constitute an equitable lien thereon enforceable against subsequent purchasers for value.

The material facts were these: J. W. Davis, the owner of record of certain lands in Franklin County, died in 1916 leaving his widow, Eugenia 0. Davis, plaintiff’s intestate, and five children him surviving. In 1918, Eugenia 0. Davis executed deed to three of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Helms v. Helms.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Gray v. . WestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  3. Wall v. . WallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  4. McNeely v. . McNeelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  5. Outland v. . OutlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Minor v. MinorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. CurrinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Higgins v. . HigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API