Legal Opinion

Marsh v. . Marsh

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The meaning of clauses in a conveyance of real property providing for the support or maintenance of a person is usually determined by a construction of the entire instrument. One clause may be a personal covenant, another a charge on the rents and profits of the land, and a third a lien or charge on the land itself. Bailey v. Bailey, 172 N. C., 671. It appears in the case before us that H. C. Marsh not only accepted the deed, but signed it under his seal; that he is bound by the provisions of the deed is therefore not in dispute. In re Peaden, 199 N. C., 486; Peel v. Peel, 196 N. C., 782. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Allen v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. Cook v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Wall v. . WallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  4. Doe Ex Dem. Woods v. WoodsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
  5. Outland v. . OutlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Minor v. MinorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Higgins v. . HigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Moore v. TilleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Hylton v. KruegerNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Bailey v. Federal Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API