Legal Opinion
Great American Lloyds Insurance Co. v. Mittlestadt
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 5, 2003No. 2-01-389-CVPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAM J. DAY, Justice.
I. Introduction
Appellees Mark and Kimberly Mittles-tadt sued appellant Great American Lloyds Insurance Company to recover on a judgment rendered against Moneyline Construction, an insured of Great American. On September 19, 2001, the trial court heard evidence and rendered a judgment in favor of the Mittlestadts in the amount of $110,664, plus attorney’s fees and costs. Great American appeals from that judgment. We reverse and render.
II. Factual BACKGROUND
On April 2, 1996, the Mittlestadts entered into a written agreement to purchase real property and a house from…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. CowanTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. GandyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Employers Casualty Co. v. BlockTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- State Farm Lloyds v. KesslerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Lay v. Aetna Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Acuity v. BagadiaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- North American Specialty Insurance v. Royal Surplus Lines InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Lamar Homes, Inc. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Nucor Corp. v. Employers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Grimes Construction, Inc. v. Great American Lloyds Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.