Legal Opinion

Uhr v. Eaton

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1938No. 5958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, District Judge.

This is an appeal from judgments directing a verdict adverse to appellant (plaintiff) as to the first and second causes of action and granting a non-suit as to the third and fourth causes, set forth in the complaint. The first cause was for false and defamatory statements contained in a criminal complaint; the second for malicious prosecution; the third for false and defamatory statements made verbally to the arresting officers; and the fourth for false imprisonment. By reason of the nature of the assignments of error and argument thereon, it becomes necessary to make a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Richter v. NeilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. El Reno Gas & Electric Co. v. SpurgeonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Hightower v. Union Savings & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Henning v. MillerWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Moore v. DurrerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cottrell v. Grand Union Tea CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Cottrell v. Grand Union Tea CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Olson v. Independent Order of ForestersUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Olson v. Independent Order of ForestersUtah Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API