Legal Opinion

Dollar Savings & Trust Co. v. Turner

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1988No. 87-1340PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

Both the trial court and the court of appeals concluded that the intent of the settlor was not discernible from the contents of the trust agreement.

We agree that the trust agreement as amended fails to express any specific intent with respect to the disposition of the residuum in the event both Minnie and Harry Applegate predeceased the settlor. It therefore remains to be determined whether R.C. 2107.52 (Ohio’s anti-lapse statute) applies to trust agreements. It provides:

“When a devise of real or personal estate is made to a relative of a testator and such relative was dead at the time the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. LysyjOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Rice v. Wheeling Dollar Savings & Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Burg v. Old National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Inter Insurance Exchange of the Chicago Motor Club v. WagstaffOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Porter v. FennerOhio Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Polen v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Baldwin v. BranchSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  3. Diller v. DillerOhio Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Polen v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Diller v. DillerOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API