Vance v. Davis
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
^AMAKER, J.
Epitomized Opinion
lis action was commenced and tried in the Gallia mon Pleas, against Hines, Director General of roads, for injury claimed to have been received lance, and upon trial a verdict was directed in r of the defendant, motion for new trial made overruled and judgment entered for defendant i the verdict.
ibsequently, a bill of exceptions having been filed and a petition in error made and filed, and e having been a change in parties defendant by on of there being another succeeding Director eral, “a waiver of issuing and service of process entry of appearance,” of the new…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Porter v. FennerOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- Columber v. City of KentonOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Kirby v. ColeOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Beverly v. BeverlyOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
- Piascik v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.