Legal Opinion

Vance v. Davis

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1923No. 17590PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

^AMAKER, J.

Epitomized Opinion

lis action was commenced and tried in the Gallia mon Pleas, against Hines, Director General of roads, for injury claimed to have been received lance, and upon trial a verdict was directed in r of the defendant, motion for new trial made overruled and judgment entered for defendant i the verdict.

ibsequently, a bill of exceptions having been filed and a petition in error made and filed, and e having been a change in parties defendant by on of there being another succeeding Director eral, “a waiver of issuing and service of process entry of appearance,” of the new…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Porter v. FennerOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Columber v. City of KentonOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Kirby v. ColeOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Beverly v. BeverlyOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Piascik v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API