Legal Opinion

Save Stanislaus Area Farm Economy v. Board of Supervisors

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 1993No. F018332PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VARTABEDIAN, J.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment directing the Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors (Board) to place on the 1992 general election ballot a slow-growth ordinance known as Measure F. Respondents on appeal, Save Stanislaus Area Farm Economy and certain named individuals (SAFE), filed a petition for writ of mandate in the trial court. The Board was respondent in that proceeding; Family Farm Alliance (FFA), appellant herein, was real party in interest below. After Measure F was ordered onto the ballot, it was defeated by a wide margin. Some of the issues…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. City of Sacramento v. DrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Mulkey v. ReitmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Committee of Seven Thousand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Yost v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Lesher Communications, Inc. v. City of Walnut CreekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Philadelphia II v. GregoireWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. PHILADELPHIA II v. GregoireWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Chula Vista Citizens for Jobs & Fair Competition v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Mervyn's v. ReyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API