Save Stanislaus Area Farm Economy v. Board of Supervisors
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VARTABEDIAN, J.
This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment directing the Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors (Board) to place on the 1992 general election ballot a slow-growth ordinance known as Measure F. Respondents on appeal, Save Stanislaus Area Farm Economy and certain named individuals (SAFE), filed a petition for writ of mandate in the trial court. The Board was respondent in that proceeding; Family Farm Alliance (FFA), appellant herein, was real party in interest below. After Measure F was ordered onto the ballot, it was defeated by a wide margin. Some of the issues…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- City of Sacramento v. DrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Mulkey v. ReitmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Committee of Seven Thousand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Yost v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Lesher Communications, Inc. v. City of Walnut CreekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Philadelphia II v. GregoireWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- PHILADELPHIA II v. GregoireWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Chula Vista Citizens for Jobs & Fair Competition v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Mervyn's v. ReyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.