Legal Opinion

Mulkey v. Reitman

California Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1966No. L.A. 28360PublishedCited by 123 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment entered upon the granting of a motion therefor in an action for relief under sections 51 and 52 of the Civil Code.1

In the trial court proceedings allegations of the complaint *532were not factually challenged, no evidence was introduced, and the only matter placed in issue was the legal sufficiency of the allegations. The motion for judgment, therefore, properly should be designated as one for judgment on the pleadings and will be so treated on appeal. In any event the allegations of the complaint stand as admitted for our purposes. (See Davis v. City of…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by123 opinions

  1. Reitman v. MulkeySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Hughes v. PairCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API