Legal Opinion

Nagele v. Miller

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1951No. 7730PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PORTER, Justice.

Appellant, Maxine Nagele, filed a creditor’s claim against the estate of John W. Smeed, deceased, with the executors of his last will and testament. The executors rejected such claim. Appellants brought this action to establish such claim. The amended demurrer to the amended complaint challenged the sufficiency of the creditor’s claim. *26The amended demurrer was sustained and the action dismissed. Appellants have appealed. The answer to the question of whether the creditor’s claim is sufficient in form and substance to meet the statutory requirements is determinative of this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pollitz v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. McGrath v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Flynn v. DriscollIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Roth v. RavichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  5. Thompson v. KoellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nagele v. MillerIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Carlson v. Estate of CarlsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API