Legal Opinion

Klickitat County v. Columbia River Gorge Commission

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided June 14, 1991No. CV-91-3027-AAMPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST THE GORGE COMMISSION AND U.S. FOREST SERVICE AND THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE

McDONALD, District Judge.

On Thursday, June 5, 1991, a hearing on the merits was held in the above captioned matter to determine whether permanent injunctive relief would be granted. Michael Haglund appeared on behalf of the plaintiffs. Lawrence Watters, Assistant Attorney General for the State of Washington was present, representing the Columbia River Gorge Commission. Stuart Schoenburg, Department of Justice, Environment and Natural Resources…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. PaineWebber Income Properties Three Ltd. Partnership Ex Rel. Third Income Properties, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1995
  2. Citizens for a Better Environment-California v. Union Oil Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1994
  3. Idaho Sporting Congress v. Computrol, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 1996
  4. Tucker v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  5. Maryland Native Plant Society v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API