Legal Opinion · Dissent
Rice v. Atkinson, Deacon, Elliott Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 20, 1921No. Docket No. 131Published
Appeal from Wayne; Goff (John H.), J. Bill by William E. Rice against the Atkinson, Deacon, Elliott Company to enjoin an interference with plaintiff's tenancy under a lease. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1DissentMoore, J.
From a decree enjoining the appellant from interfering with the tenancy of the plaintiff the case is brought here by appeal. Counsel agree that the facts are as stated in the decree, as follows:
“That said plaintiff is the tenant and in possession of the offices known as suite No. 31 in the Detroit Opera House Building; that he went into possession of said offices in August, 1898, when said opera house building was completed, under a written lease from the Clark estate, then the owners of said opera house, the term of said lease being either three or five years, and his tenancy of said offices…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Scott v. BeecherMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Schneider v. LordMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Ganson v. BaldwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Barlum v. BergerMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Grady v. WarrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1895