Legal Opinion

Grady v. Warrell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Summary proceedings to recover the possession of leased premises. Complainant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Complainant appeals from a judgment against her in summary proceedings to recover possession of' the west 32 feet of lot 8, block 6, Campau’s plat, in the city of Grand Eapids. Upon lot 8 was an hotel and bam, the premises being known as the '“Michigan House.” Jacob Nagle, complainant’s ancestor, was the owner in fee, and he made a lease of the premises for the term of three years from May 1, 1887, to Ira O. Hatch. .On July 5,1888, he extended the lease for two years more. In 1889 the barn burned, and a new lease was made by the same parties dated November 1, 1889, for two and a half years…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Huntington v. ParkhurstMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Rough v. WomerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rice v. Atkinson, Deacon, Elliott Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Kelly v. SproulMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Kuhns v. Marvel Paint StoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Rice v. Atkinson, Deacon, Elliott Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API