Ganson v. Baldwin
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair. (Canfield, J.) Summary proceedings to recover possession of land-Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, C. J.
The action in this case was commenced before a circuit court commissioner for the recovery of the' possession of the S. of the S. £ of the N. W. {- of section 6, township 6 N., of range 17 E., county of St. Clair. The cause was appealed to the circuit court, where the-complainant had verdict and judgment.
The husband of the complainant, one Samuel Ganson, owned the N. $ of the S. of said N. W. £ of said section 6, and on the 30th day of July, 1886, he entered into the following agreement with the defendant:
“This memorandum of agreement, made and concluded *219between Samuel G-anson of the first…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dayton v. VandoozerMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by6 opinions
- Steel v. Clinton Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Rice v. Atkinson, Deacon, Elliott Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Barrett v. CoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Hicks v. SteelMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Wixom v. HoarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.