Legal Opinion
Trent Tube Division v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided November 27, 1990No. Court 87-12-01189PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CARMAN, Judge:
Defendant-intervenors, Avesta Sandvik Tube, AB (AST), contest the remand results in Welded Stainless Steel Pipes and Tubes From Sweden, Inv. No. 781-TA-354 (Final) (Remand), USITC Pub. 2304 (Aug. 1990). Defendant, United States International Trade Commission (Commission or ITC), opposes AST’s challenge and seeks to sustain the remand determination as supported by substantial evidence on the record and as otherwise in accordance with law. Plaintiff (Trent) joins defendant.
I. BACKGROUND
This case grew out of plaintiff’s challenge to the final determination of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- American Spring Wire Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States Steel Group—A Unit of USX Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- Trent Tube Division v. Avesta Sandvik Tube AbCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Calabrian Corp. v. United States International Trade CommissionUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- Chung Ling Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- Taiwan Semiconductor Industry Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.