Legal Opinion

Aichele v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 26, 2013No. Case No. CV 12-10863 DMG (FFMx)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION [DOC. # 62]

DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification [Doc. # 62]. The Court held a hearing on August 23, 2013. The Court has duly considered the arguments and evidence presented in support of and in opposition to the motion. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED.

I

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiffs, Cheryl Achele, Jonathan Mexander, Carina Clemente, Michael Prysner, and James Weitz, commenced this action on December 20, 2012, individually and as class…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coburn v. City of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  2. Don't Shoot Portland v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022
  3. Puente v. Phoenix, City ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API