Puente v. Phoenix, City of
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Puente, et al., No. CV-18-02778-PHX-JJT 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 City of Phoenix, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 At issue is the admissibility of rebuttal expert testimony provided by Dr. David J. 16 McIntyre on behalf of Defendants. The Court considers Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude 17 Defendants’ “Rebuttal” Expert, David J. McIntyre (Doc. 241, Mot.), Defendants’ 18 Opposition (Doc. 283, Opp’n), and Plaintiffs’ Reply (Doc. 307, Reply). The Court finds 19 this matter appropriate for decision without oral…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Lavern Hankey, AKA Poo, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Stuart v. LairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Tortu v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Diane CandoliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.