Legal Opinion

Thomson v. Reynolds

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1918No. 2763PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Salt Lake County, Third District; Hon. C. W. Morse, Judge. Action by Matthew MeB. Thomson against Charles Reynolds and Mary Atkinson. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, C. J.

It would be futile to attempt to pass upon the merits of the ease on this appeal. We shall therefore refer to the record only for the purpose of showing why the case legally cannot, and, as a matter of justice to all the interested parties, should not, be determined on the merits by this court.

The action originated in the justice court between Matthew McB. Thomson as plaintiff and Charles Reynolds as defendant, as an action of unlawful detainer, under Comp. Laws 3907, section 3575. The complaint was filed and summons issued pursuant to the provisions of section 3580, and the allegations of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Silvey v. SummerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  2. Felton v. MillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Kepley v. LukeIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Rosenthyne v. Matthews-McCulloch Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Texas Land Co. v. TurmanTexas Supreme Court · 1880

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mitsuuchi v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Richardson v. KingIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Thompson v. ReynoldsUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Huntsman v. HuntsmanUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Ward v. WardUtah Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API